Last post Thu, Aug 14 2008 15:31 by
d012560c. 9 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (10 items)
Sort Posts:
-
-
Fri, Jan 18 2008 4:33
|
Re: Search option questions
|
|
In reply to
|
-
Fri, Jan 18 2008 5:42
|
Re: Search option questions
|
|
In reply to
|
-
Mr. Plow

-
Joined on
Sat, Oct 27 2007
- Field of Dreams
-
Posts
217
|
OK, that answers my first question.
But when I said:
Mr. Plow: Also, is there a way to use
the minus symbol to remove something from the search? For example, if I
wanted to search for a girl I knew only to be named Anne, but knew that
she was not Anne from Hegre or Lovely Anne, I would type "Anne -Hegre
-Lovely".
I would add "-Hegre" or "-Lovely" in order to eliminate their
posts from appearing when I search (so it would be easier to find the Anne I am looking for). Does that make more sense? If not it's really no big deal, I don't want to take up too much of your time. Thanks again
|
|
-
Fri, Jan 18 2008 8:52
|
Re: Search option questions
|
|
In reply to
|
-
Fri, Jan 18 2008 12:02
|
Re: Search option questions
|
|
In reply to
|
-
Tue, Aug 12 2008 17:15
|
Re: Search option questions
|
|
In reply to
|
-
d012560c

-
Joined on
Wed, Apr 11 2007
- *BANNED*
-
Posts
73
|
funky2004: Our searchtool doesn't support any digits like + or - or " i.o. to include or exclude some search criteriae.
Hi,
In an older post, I read about a plug-in(s) with Firefox for search PeachyForum (and some other sites as well). I wanted to know if there were any issues/problems prior to installing them. Also, where is the location of the 'definitive' thread that covers everything I need to know about that plug-in(s).
My motivation for inquiring about the plug-in came about because a recent search for an Ivana who isn't a Fukalot resulted in my getting FuckedAlot because I couldn't trim down the search results with a NOT search operator.
Cheers!
|
|
-
Tue, Aug 12 2008 18:15
|
Re: Search option questions
|
|
In reply to
|
-
Hunter27

-
Joined on
Sun, Dec 12 2004
- Classified
-
Posts
3,385

|
I think that a + - operator would be extremely useful here, but to be blunt it’s not going to happen within the foreseeable future… The best way to narrow down results is to go to a popular TGP like ask Jolene or ask Tiava and locate a URL that you think might likely have already been posted. If you already have a URL in mind, trim off the http:// in the beginning and any other sort of possible referrer ID from the end, and try using the search to find the URL.
Yes it’s a bit of a pain in the ass but you just have to work with the tools that are handed to you, for free. We tend to tell our members that beggars can’t be choosers and yet offer up solutions to try and help anyone who might have questions. Currently operators are not an option, so we just have to make do with what we have and try to work together and find some shortcuts.
As for the plug-in, I believe your talking about the one created by KS a very long time ago? It did not offer any sort of advanced searching, rather it used a form to submit a quarry directly to the original search DB that your currently using now. The only handy thing about the addition was that it integrated peachy search into your browser. Maybe I’ll look into it and recreate a 2.0? Other than that, I’m not aware of any others.
|
|
-
Tue, Aug 12 2008 22:33
|
Re: Search option questions
|
|
In reply to
|
-
d012560c

-
Joined on
Wed, Apr 11 2007
- *BANNED*
-
Posts
73
|
@ Hunter27 ... thanks for getting back to me.
Ouch is all I can say especially since I am very spoiled from Google and AltaVista.
Question: How well does Google index the forum threads at Peachy, not counting lag time between 'bot searches? Also, why is it that using the Google cache brings me to a regular PeachyForum page devoid of any information on it? If I click on the non-cached link, I get what I expect to see from Google and Peachy. Does this have anything to do with not being logged on at the time and/or behavior perculiar to Firefox (I'm using Maxthon for the rest of the evening, so I can't re-create the issue)?
Cheers!
|
|
-
Wed, Aug 13 2008 4:45
|
Re: Search option questions
|
|
In reply to
|
-
funky2004

-
Joined on
Thu, Feb 12 2004
- Amsterdam / Netherlands
-
Posts
39,235

|
d012560c:
Question: How well does Google index the forum threads at Peachy, not counting lag time between 'bot searches? Also, why is it that using the Google cache brings me to a regular PeachyForum page devoid of any information on it? If I click on the non-cached link, I get what I expect to see from Google and Peachy. Does this have anything to do with not being logged on at the time and/or behavior perculiar to Firefox (I'm using Maxthon for the rest of the evening, so I can't re-create the issue)?
Did you already try this link ? :
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=site%3Apeachyforum.com+&btnG=Google+Search
In average Google takes about 6-8 weeks for indexing
|
|
-
Thu, Aug 14 2008 15:31
|
Re: Search option questions
|
|
In reply to
|
-
d012560c

-
Joined on
Wed, Apr 11 2007
- *BANNED*
-
Posts
73
|
funky2004: d012560c:
Question: How well does Google index the forum threads at Peachy, not counting lag time between 'bot searches? Also, why is it that using the Google cache brings me to a regular PeachyForum page devoid of any information on it? If I click on the non-cached link, I get what I expect to see from Google and Peachy. Does this have anything to do with not being logged on at the time and/or behavior perculiar to Firefox (I'm using Maxthon for the rest of the evening, so I can't re-create the issue)?
Did you already try this link ? :
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=site%3Apeachyforum.com+&btnG=Google+Search
In average Google takes about 6-8 weeks for indexing
I swear by that Google search operator ... it's what I had in mind when I posed that question. I'm surprised it takes them that long to index. Is it that way for all of PF or do they index some parts of PF more frequently?
BTW, that same operator in Google Images + PicLens = eye candy smorgasbord :)) Cheers
|
|
Page 1 of 1 (10 items)
|