| scoobysnaccks wrote: |
| Yes but if you search for girls before posting - adelina model and cherry potter are two examples - the search states no results, but if you post these girls they are linked by moderators to existing threads which the search function can't - or won't - find. |
|
The reason for "adelina model" is that the original thread is named as "adelinamodel" - if you search with that, it brings up the original thread... so, that's not GoogleSeach problem (but a naming problem). And even with "Adelina model" you get 34 hits, so you can check she has been talked before and answer to that thread before posting a new one... and find the original from the reposts threads.
"Cherry Potter" is a spelling problem - her original thread is named "Sherri Angel", and her thread doesn't contain "potter". "Sherri Potter" or "Sherry Potter" brings up some hits, with a link to her original thread (=sherri angel).
I'm not trying to defend GoogleSeach to the end, and I do admit our internal seach engine was better (how could it not be, I've even coded some parts of it! ![Big Smile [:D]](/emoticons/emotion-2.gif)
), and I do want to get it back... but GoogleSeach is much better then nothing and the most problems (like sherri and adelina) couldn't be fixed with a new seach engine...