Awesome.

i guess u all see this one

http://www.spunkyangels.com/preview.php?modelid=1

I think this is new


http://www.yourdailygirls.com/galleries/spunkys_angels_64/

Okay here is some speculation...looks like someone forgot to put on panties...:)

http://www.yourdailygirls.com/galleries/spunkys_angels_64/spunkys_angels_64_004.jpg

There's only one shot that looks like the indention of wearing any but when you photoshop that area on 64_004 it looks like she has nothing on.  Whats the verdict for those that can use exposure well?

Some new pics in these older sets:

http://www.8teenfiles.com/gals/angels/amyfur409898/

http://www.8teenfiles.com/gals/angels/amyhall363522/

SIXFOOTCOW:

Okay here is some speculation...looks like someone forgot to put on panties...:)

http://www.yourdailygirls.com/galleries/spunkys_angels_64/spunkys_angels_64_004.jpg

There's only one shot that looks like the indention of wearing any but when you photoshop that area on 64_004 it looks like she has nothing on.  Whats the verdict for those that can use exposure well?

Zoom in and try bright filter in Photoshop or anyother software, i tried, i think she is not wearing it.

hardcorecowboy:

SIXFOOTCOW:

Okay here is some speculation...looks like someone forgot to put on panties...:)

http://www.yourdailygirls.com/galleries/spunkys_angels_64/spunkys_angels_64_004.jpg

There's only one shot that looks like the indention of wearing any but when you photoshop that area on 64_004 it looks like she has nothing on.  Whats the verdict for those that can use exposure well?

Zoom in and try bright filter in Photoshop or anyother software, i tried, i think she is not wearing it.

I would probably disagree and say she is wearing them. I am always the skeptic and don't believe these sites just make a mistake like that. I am sure every photo they decide to publish has been carefully looked at, or edited (if you believe that), to be sure there is a tantalizing hint of something without actually showing anything.

I could not agree more with you. If she had no panties on then spunky would make a bigger deal then that. I can zoom very well on my computer and it looks like she is wearing beige ones

doug484:

I would probably disagree and say she is wearing them. I am always the skeptic and don't believe these sites just make a mistake like that. I am sure every photo they decide to publish has been carefully looked at, or edited (if you believe that), to be sure there is a tantalizing hint of something without actually showing anything.

I agree with you and I think she is wearing them. I'm normally skeptical too and doubt that they would make a mistake, but I doubt this is intentional: http://img128.imagevenue.com/view.php?image=14880_spunkyangels-sm-118_123_121lo.jpg

she needs to show us what she has to offer underneath those shirt :)

bobtemp:

doug484:

I would probably disagree and say she is wearing them. I am always the skeptic and don't believe these sites just make a mistake like that. I am sure every photo they decide to publish has been carefully looked at, or edited (if you believe that), to be sure there is a tantalizing hint of something without actually showing anything.

I agree with you and I think she is wearing them. I'm normally skeptical too and doubt that they would make a mistake, but I doubt this is intentional: http://img128.imagevenue.com/view.php?image=14880_spunkyangels-sm-118_123_121lo.jpg

<br>
In this picture she is sticking out more than her tongue. Yes, Amy wasn't paying attention. But I am. Yummy!

More pics & less talk.

Here's more pics from the latest set.

http://amy.crocogirls.com/tight-dress/

Four_winds:

http://promo.averotica.com/gals/20080113-35-dasha/?wm=1646552 http://peachyforum.com/forums/thread/297447.aspx Match moles on her arms and her face, its her. Before some "augmentations", but its her.

WOW! I hope you don't work for the TSA!

Sorry, I don't see the same thing you do.

Four_winds:

http://promo.averotica.com/gals/20080113-35-dasha/?wm=1646552

http://peachyforum.com/forums/thread/297447.aspx

Match moles on her arms and her face, its her. Before some "augmentations", but its her.

There is definetely no need to argue here...

ron888:

Sorry, I don't see the same thing you do.

You can't view it with firefox for some reason...I tried IE and it came up correctly.

...and as much as I'd like it to be her, I don't think it is.

if you take a close look at he there are three thing.

1) the mole on the left side of her face

2) the mole on her right arm

3) the mole on her chest by the neck.

Some were airbrushed out but if you go back through amy's photos you can find examples of all three of the moles in the right places. Also, she clearly had a nose job. If you just look at the shape and proportions of her curves, boobs, and even her posing style, they are all identical. I'm pretty sure its her and if you take the time to go back I think you will see it.

Keep in mind that a nose job can really make a difference....

This post has been deleted.

Four_winds:

http://promo.averotica.com/gals/20080113-35-dasha/?wm=1646552 http://peachyforum.com/forums/thread/297447.aspx Match moles on her arms and her face, its her. Before some "augmentations", but its her.

You need to get your eyes checked. That gal is not even close to looking like Amy..