[quote user="lastbreath"]Haha, When Ariel was here, she was "one of the most beautiful cuties with 2000 daily visitors". Now she's out and she surprisingly transforms in ugly boy-squirrel? Shame on all of you![/quote] 

Funny since I was never a fan and I called a a squirrel :D

[quote user="lastbreath"]Haha, When Ariel was here, she was "one of the most beautiful cuties with 2000 daily visitors". Now she's out and she surprisingly transforms in ugly boy-squirrel? Shame on all of you! She can't respond for manager's acting so why do you make her guilty? All you just prove the truth: glory is a bitch, make a wrong move and your fans will throw a stone in your face...[/quote] 

 

LOL it's true. I also liked her (at least 2-3 years ago). But again she wasn't anything special.

 

And no, she's not guilty for the fact the webmasters are retards

[quote user="gerodinis"]

LOL it's true. I also liked her (at least 2-3 years ago). But again she wasn't anything special.

 

And no, she's not guilty for the fact the webmasters are retards

[/quote] 

 

Never know. She might be in agreement with them! Just saying :P

OK, perhaps she's not repsonsible for or even connected to the actions of her managers, but she will surely be aware of the actions they take apparently in her behalf and has the choice to support them or tell them to sling their hook

welp, i thought she was cute but a little boring.  Always checked hoping to see her starting some kind of hardcore.  I guess now i'll never know if she does... pretty poor choice on her webmaster's part.  I think it was the anticipation that got a lot of people into her and other models like her.  No great loss though, considering the mind boggling number of girls out there.

Neither I liked her.

That makes me really really sad...

Forgive me, but I'm a little confused. Was it Ariel herself kicking up the fuss or just her money-hungry management team. If it wasnt her - why do people keep calling her a bitch, probably had nothing to do with it. If she did kick up the fuss - skrew her and the donky she and her chipmunk face rode in on.

[quote user="Ardus_Kaine"]Forgive me, but I'm a little confused. Was it Ariel herself kicking up the fuss or just her money-hungry management team. If it wasnt her - why do people keep calling her a bitch, probably had nothing to do with it. If she did kick up the fuss - skrew her and the donky she and her chipmunk face rode in on.[/quote]

 

Thing is, if she really was against it then she would have tried to stop them. I mean, what are they going to do if their model refuses to work? That means one thing to me. She agrees with what the management is doing. 

Her site has really gone down hill. Her image sets are split up into 3 parts and slowly distributed over the coarse of a week and a half (only about 3 full set a month!), and in each set only a few pussy shots at the very end (some sets have no pussy shots at all), and it's been well over a month since her last video. I recommend no one sign up for her site.

It's too bad because she is one of my favorites - I hope her new site comes out soon and is much better.

I've only just become aware of Ariel being blacklisted here... how absurd to serve a notice on peachyforum, one of the few places which enforces a rule that copyrighted material isn't shared. Whatever c*nt was behind this deserves his site to go downhill fast, and a lot more besides. All peachy ever did was benefit him by giving free publicity. I doubt Ariel herself had any influence/control about the legal threat, and I won't let it put me off her too much, but it's a shame I'll have this nagging feeling of being let down again as were Nadia/Andrea Spinks' fans from similar legal bullshit. I remember requesting her here before she became Ariel Rebel, when she was simply Ariel at Nubiles. But lately I've frequented other forums where her full sets are being shared rather than peachy, so I hadn't noticed her thread being pulled.

In the relatively short life cycle of a model shurely any publicity is good publicity,especialy in the porn game.In her case she is not in the top ten in popularity ratings and so has done herself no favours taking this attitude.With the overwhelming amount of new talent ,competition, pouring into the industry she has guaranteed herself an early retirement.I support Peachy's actions ,there's plenty more where she came from.

http://arielrebelunplugged.com/2009/02/dumbass-blasting-of-the-day-ariel-rebel-vs-peachy-forum.html

 

According to her there was no legal action undertaken or even threatened.

 

Seems like it was just a misunderstanding with funky2004 that got out of hand.

[quote user="knosh"]

According to her there was no legal action undertaken or even threatened.

[/quote]

LMAO 'misunderstanding'....'no legal action'...?   (See Vatsis' post on page 1 of this thread.)

Official DMCA-notice served May20.2009 by some asshole lawyers in Irving (TX) Eric Green on behalf of copyright-holders PanchoDog and Wonton Media.  Those are her  real 'bosses'.  Seems she even isn't a master in her own house...  Those legal sharks were close shutting down our servers.  No room for any misunderstanding.  That slut remains banned !

ahh, well that blog post I linked was from February.

 

She also mentions several times (and quite adamantly) in other blog posts that she runs everything herself, which makes me wonder about panchodog and wonton media's involvement.

[quote user="knosh"]

.....which makes me wonder about panchodog and wonton media's involvement.

[/quote]

http://affiliates.panchodog.com/external.php?page=sites&nats

http://www.ip-adress.com/whois/ariel-rebel.com

I wonder if she even writes her own blog. Did Vastis actually give that reply? Seems rather measured  and "her" response vindictive. As for her running her own show, yeah, and she probably just turned 18, too.

vacuity

I just read that blog link, and it makes no sense on her end. Why would a place like this blacklist someone unless there was a legal threat? It wouldn't pay to deny people who visit here access to a model unless THEY HAD A VERY GOOD REASON, i.e. legal action. I also read the "French Entry" she put up (being Canadian I can do that), and they don't even match up. She didn't write that English language blog, her legal attack dogs did. I have a feeling she is just a pawn in all of this. But I still support Peachy Forum, keep her banned guys!

[quote user="vacuity"]

I wonder if she even writes her own blog. Did Vastis actually give that reply? Seems rather measured  and "her" response vindictive. As for her running her own show, yeah, and she probably just turned 18, too.

vacuity

[/quote] 

Yeah she just turned 18, for the 10th time! 

The problem with Peachy Forum is that it Still contains copyrighted material. I can go to almost any Models page right now and I guarantee I find a link to a tube site.

 

Its possible that Ariel’s thread became so huge that there was almost no need to sign up to her website, as there was just so much free content all in one place. When a performer creates her own website and becomes established maybe they don’t need sites like Peachy Forum as much. This is especially true if all of her new films are released through one main website.

 

A model being removed form Peachy Forum may be a good thing. It should make people more aware of not posting to illegal material and to report posts which contain links to free porn.

 

I think we should go a little easier on Ariel. I doubt she writes her own Blog and I don’t think its cool for anyone to be calling her names. It hardly encourages Porn Stars to become members.

 

I also think that the ‘List of Banned Sites’ should be made private as it advertises places to get copyrighted material.