I know this a totally moot point, but if only for clarification.  "Babes 30+" defines "Teens' to range from 18 through 29 years old (which is strikingly odd), but what happens when they turn 30?  Will they miraculously switch into the "Babes" area.  I was looking up Mason Storm as a MILF and after some time, found her in the "Teens" area.  Mason Storm, in accordance to  http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1482996/ was born May 6, 1974 which puts her at 34 years old.  So my question in all actuality is what is the point of having two separate areas if there isn't a way for the server to define the difference?  I know that it's just a basic guide, as teens range to 29, but it seems a bit redundant as there will never be an accurate placement until and unless they are physically moved.  That would be a full time job considering the fact that well, we know they're over 18, but most actual birth dates are unknown.  Plus there are over 2200 pages of "Teens" to sift through.

I mean absolutely no disrespect to whom ever created the new section, it's not a bad idea but it's an impossible task to maintain.  However, if you really want to expose yourselves to this onslaught of upcoming work, Mason Storm http://peachyforum.com/forums/p/139633/273434.aspx#273434 is prime candidate to be first.  Here's an idea, perhaps you could challenge some of the reliable/responsable voluntary members to sift through the section, divie out 10-20 ascending pages per week to X amount of members (avoid duplicate searches) and submit them into a folder for relocation.  As an incentive, offer a free membership to some paysite or something.  I realize this would still be a waste of time without most birthdates and maintance would be a bear, but it would be a start and could load direct into the next server when the time comes.

Ah, what the hell do I know!  It's was a dumbass idea, I was bored and just felt like writing something.  Delete this if you want.

30+ is just very arbitrary.  Same thing with 18+ being legal age.

You have to draw a line somewhere.

Strictly speaking 'girls' like Tawnee Stone, Jordan Capri, Trisha Uptown, Sophie Moon etc should be in the 30+ section as well. They must be in their early 30's by now.

Step-by-step 30+ threads in Teens will be moved to 30+ when those threads emerge. Most are dormant threads.

Vatsis created the 30+ section as a trial.  Maybe it will be abolished in due course alltogether.  It's noticeable that there are hardly any posts or new requests in the 30+ section since its creation.

As I see it, all amateurs are divided into "teens" and "MILFs/matures".  And 30 is a good separation line.  Usually at that age one can no longer pretend to be a teen.

Strictly speaking 'girls' like Tawnee Stone, Jordan Capri, Trisha Uptown, Sophie Moon etc should be in the 30+ section as well. They must be in their early 30's by now.

According to IMDb, Tawnee Stone is 26, Trisha Uptown is 29.

Those are all valid points. Maybe if the girl/babe had a long career, she'd actually need 2 thread - one on teen, one on babe, like Tracy Lords? Horrible task. Maybe we should more like see what are the percentages of her galleries: 70% teen, 30% mature would be a teen-topic. I don't know, keep the suggestions coming!

The voting is still active: http://peachyforum.com/forums/t/225238.aspx . Currently it looks like the MILF-section will stay.

The idea behind the whole new forum was to 1) offer milf-lovers a faster way to browser peachy and 2) keep granny-looking babes out of teen -section, since even they are popular, some don't like them in there. And actually they should be removed, but we don't have a heart to do that.

As you floated the matter to see what the response would be, I shall respond:  No, I do not wish any girl's work to be split into multiple threads, no matter how old she now is and how long she worked.  What's the solution to such clogged forums?  I do not know.  The actual problem of course is forums combining ugly women with beautiful women, and there's no solution to that, as Peachy visitors have overlapping but very different tastes in women.  Oh well.  If I had to choose between being shot at, starving to death, and having too many women I don't like mixed in with my good-looking women, I'll choose that third problem.

 Maybe we should change the terminology as to not upset the models ;-) Teens and… “Adult Models”? Mature adult models that no longer or don’t fit into the “Teen” category. I think it’s pretty clear when looking at a model if she’s a teen or not, and it should be left up to the discretion of the requester and/or moderator to determine the proper place.

So, no fine line, no actual point breaking number to determine where a thread goes. Our members here are smart enough to decide where it goes for themselves, and as such it’s how I think it should be. Of course a ton of threads would be moved over time, but in the end the teen section would be.. Well, just teens.

In most cases, especially regarding models past who have modeled only in their teens and early twenties, then apparently vanished like Tawnee Stone. According to her online works she’s forever a teen until the thread can reflect galleries that show otherwise. It doesn’t make sense to move a thread to “Adult Models” that contains dozens of galleries of a teen just because she modeled ten years ago and must be over thirty now. The content in the thread simply doesn’t reflect the substance that the adult model seeker is looking for.

That said, I get to wondering if it might be possible to create a “Retired Model” forum for models who have not produced new content in over a year or two. It would be more of an archive rather than a request section.

Maybe it sounds complicated? Teens, Adult Models, Model Archive, Retired Models. Right now it’s just one giant mass of chaos. It will take a buss load of time and effort to sort it all out but in the end it will be a more organized, useful place that will help members find the exact sort of content they are looking for, while preventing anyone from blowing bucks on babes who have been out of the biz for years.