Again, this pic is pretty old, like at least 15 years.
I wonder wether MET would be known to promote pics of sets they don't actually feature?
I'm pretty sure MET removed this girl from their portfolio, because of legal problems. That girl was clearly underaged when pics were taken. In the early beginning of MET they featured a lot of girls who were too young according to present legal standards. Some 10 years ago laws on these issues weren't yet as strict as they are now.