Emily 18 page 12

Tue, Sep 5 2006 1:51
limbodan
Posts 29
-removed-
Tue, Sep 5 2006 2:37
noize69
Posts 15

-removed-

Tue, Sep 5 2006 14:31
steve2006
Virginia, USA
Posts 440
                 removed link
Tue, Sep 5 2006 14:35
steve2006
Virginia, USA
Posts 440
                      delete link
Tue, Sep 5 2006 16:45
steve2006
Virginia, USA
Posts 440
delete
Tue, Sep 5 2006 21:32
andy6916
Posts 12

Drooling

They REALLY are real!

Wed, Sep 6 2006 9:17
cruzaw8
Posts 52
on the set posted by steve she has not scar so that shows she could have paintshoped it
Wed, Sep 6 2006 10:28
zubat
Posts 442
The image files from the set Steve posted are bit-for-bit the same as the ones I linked to earlier (now deleted.) This proves nothing, other than that petiteteenager.com will lie about the contents of sites to drive revenue. Her site doesn't have those particular nude photos at this time. Don't shoot me, I'm just the messenger.
Wed, Sep 6 2006 10:30
elder7
Posts 24
the way i see it.. it's good..now we just have to get summer and kari!
Wed, Sep 6 2006 13:06
betax9
Posts 50
zubat:
The image files from the set Steve posted are bit-for-bit the same as the ones I linked to earlier (now deleted.) This proves nothing, other than that petiteteenager.com will lie about the contents of sites to drive revenue. Her site doesn't have those particular nude photos at this time. Don't shoot me, I'm just the messenger.



i hope your happy
posting fake images around
Wed, Sep 6 2006 16:07
steve2006
Virginia, USA
Posts 440
betax9:
zubat:
The image files from the set Steve posted are bit-for-bit the same as the ones I linked to earlier (now deleted.) This proves nothing, other than that petiteteenager.com will lie about the contents of sites to drive revenue. Her site doesn't have those particular nude photos at this time. Don't shoot me, I'm just the messenger.


i hope your happy
posting fake images around


Please note I removed the link being questioned, as it it was faked I didn't want anything to do with adding to the problem of passing around copyrighted pics.  I certainly hope no one here would have anything to do with creating this phony advertising as I certainly didn't or wouldn't.  My 2 cents
Wed, Sep 6 2006 21:33
steve2006
Virginia, USA
Posts 440
Wed, Sep 6 2006 22:46
zubat
Posts 442
betax9:
i hope your happy
posting fake images around


I used to create fake nudes. I understand how they're created, what's possible, and what's not possible. I no longer create fake nudes, nor link to them, because broadband (specifically the larger photos that it enables) makes it imposible to hide the evidence completely. So I can't really answer your question in this case, but thanks for playing! And now back to your regularly scheduled posting of topless-only, copyrighted Emily pictures.
Thu, Sep 7 2006 20:44
steve2006
Virginia, USA
Posts 440
Fri, Sep 8 2006 22:32
steve2006
Virginia, USA
Posts 440
Sat, Sep 9 2006 5:16
toucher
Posts 5
-REMOVED-
Tue, Sep 12 2006 7:54
stevenj
Posts 2

minge

Tue, Sep 12 2006 9:13
betax9
Posts 50
:)

Sort Posts: