PeachyForum
PeachyForum » Teen Archive » Emily 18

Emily 18 page 14

Sun, Sep 24 2006 17:57
steve2006
Virginia, USA
Posts 440
Sun, Sep 24 2006 19:31
steve2006
Virginia, USA
Posts 440
Sun, Sep 24 2006 19:36
steve2006
Virginia, USA
Posts 440
    Worshiphttp://www.8teenfiles.com/gals/emily18/124quewh/  I'm in love

Oh, what I wouldn't give to be that little stuffed bunny rabbit right now..."sigh"
Mon, Sep 25 2006 14:37
dazr
U.K
Posts 2,371
Tue, Sep 26 2006 13:59
doomsday
Posts 102
Tue, Sep 26 2006 23:03
mac11
Posts 110
She has done full nude ya know??
Wed, Sep 27 2006 1:32
cedrick
Posts 2
Arrrgh, she indeed did pose nude and though the link is still here at:

http://petiteteenagergalleries.com/galleries/Emily_18/            (the sept 5th link)

it now doesnt link to the pictures Crying

but it WAS there, the set was called emilymagazine (and had sidebars as if it were scanned from a magazine)

http://galleries3.petiteteenager.com/1/emilymagazine/    <----cant get link to work anymore, but, she was indeed showing all her charms ;)


Wed, Sep 27 2006 4:28
sTinkinitiaTION
Posts 650
Wed, Sep 27 2006 4:42
sTinkinitiaTION
Posts 650
And apparently she does work for http://www.barefootcamgirls.com/ ....which I would kill to see!!!! check the 'updates' sections.
Wed, Sep 27 2006 5:40
Fuck_the_bozoz
Finland
Posts 1,153
Wed, Sep 27 2006 11:32
betax9
Posts 50
sTinkinitiaTION:
And apparently she does work for http://www.barefootcamgirls.com/ ....which I would kill to see!!!! check the 'updates' sections.



she does not do work for them she is exclusive to emily18.com
and those nude pictures where apparently forced by the photgrapher to make her do them
not for her emily18.com website

Wed, Sep 27 2006 23:23
sTinkinitiaTION
Posts 650

So are the pics on the barefootcamgirls site just compilations from her existing  emily18.com work... Or?

And I think the use of the word "forced" is probably more than a bit extreme. I have heard similar rumours as well, but again, "forced"  being an operative word here, one would have to assume, or at least hope Emily had taken the appropiate legal action(s). It's seemingly more plausible given the nature of the "adult" industry that she was connivingly persuaded into taking her painties off. I highly doubt a gun was put to her head insinuating in a forced removal of underwear and forced poses.

Thu, Sep 28 2006 5:46
theodop
Posts 10
Actually, it's very simple. Emily has said on her forums that she has no problem with nudity, and if she could do nude photos for the site she would, however she's hesitant to because she doesn't know who might see it. I don't like this, but it's her choice and if she wants to do nudey magazines because they're not as prolific as the internet then she should be able to.

The pictures are obviously real, even though her tattoos and scar have been airbrushed out, you can still see the edges of where her scar has been airbrushed. She did nude pics, get over it.
Fri, Sep 29 2006 12:47
billyellis
Posts 339
O.   M .  F.   G.

Enough already!  Shut the F*** up about whether they are real or not.  They look good.  If you are a heterosexual male, that is all you should care about.  Stop posting to this thread to have a conversation about something only gay fashion magazine editors would give a rat's behind about.  You are killing me.
Sat, Sep 30 2006 16:33
steve2006
Virginia, USA
Posts 440
Sat, Sep 30 2006 16:34
steve2006
Virginia, USA
Posts 440
Sat, Sep 30 2006 16:37
steve2006
Virginia, USA
Posts 440
Sat, Sep 30 2006 16:38
steve2006
Virginia, USA
Posts 440
Sat, Sep 30 2006 16:38
steve2006
Virginia, USA
Posts 440
Tue, Oct 3 2006 18:38
steve2006
Virginia, USA
Posts 440

Sort Posts: