I know what did I start... :S

that isnt her pussy it is obvious look at the form of it it dont match

Let it go you wack-off freaks even if it is fake (but its not), it still look like a naked girl so do your thing and remember to clean up after.

It's strange.....Fake or no fake????Very strange....

A new real pics now:

 

http://www.highwaytgp.com/babes-b/emily18/8/askjolenecom.html

definitely NOT fakes

edhunter:

It's strange.....Fake or no fake????Very strange....

A new real pics now:

 

http://www.highwaytgp.com/babes-b/emily18/8/askjolenecom.html

thats like 2 years old lol

and it is not her pussy i can tell you that much
be decived if you want but they brushed her body so i think they did her puss too
if you look you can see it is not quite right lined up

Just adding my 2 cents to the beaten down subject of whether or not the nudes are really of Emily or not, I tend to agree with Betax that they are faked or photoshopped or whatever you want to call it.  I just doubt the photos are true nudes as they do look a lot like some previous phots she had taken for her site.  Also consider she has a paying website audience of loyal supporters who would be upset if she bared all for a less loyal following of just magazine subscripters who didn't even know her.  Consider how much more the magazine would have sold if they had put her on the cover and advertised her as a internet model going nude for the first time.  

http://www.teentrap.com/hosted/emily18/reading/index.html

I'll never look at a baloon the same again after this           

-removed-

POSTING COPYRIGHTED CONTENT WILL GET YOU BANNED.

Please don't make more work for all ready busy moderators, thanks.

-removed-

-removed-

-removed-

                 removed link

                      delete link

delete

They REALLY are real!

on the set posted by steve she has not scar so that shows she could have paintshoped it

The image files from the set Steve posted are bit-for-bit the same as the ones I linked to earlier (now deleted.) This proves nothing, other than that petiteteenager.com will lie about the contents of sites to drive revenue. Her site doesn't have those particular nude photos at this time. Don't shoot me, I'm just the messenger.

the way i see it.. it's good..now we just have to get summer and kari!

zubat:

The image files from the set Steve posted are bit-for-bit the same as the ones I linked to earlier (now deleted.) This proves nothing, other than that petiteteenager.com will lie about the contents of sites to drive revenue. Her site doesn't have those particular nude photos at this time. Don't shoot me, I'm just the messenger.

i hope your happy
posting fake images around

betax9:

zubat:

The image files from the set Steve posted are bit-for-bit the same as the ones I linked to earlier (now deleted.) This proves nothing, other than that petiteteenager.com will lie about the contents of sites to drive revenue. Her site doesn't have those particular nude photos at this time. Don't shoot me, I'm just the messenger.

i hope your happy
posting fake images around

Please note I removed the link being questioned, as it it was faked I didn't want anything to do with adding to the problem of passing around copyrighted pics.  I certainly hope no one here would have anything to do with creating this phony advertising as I certainly didn't or wouldn't. 

betax9:

i hope your happy
posting fake images around

I used to create fake nudes. I understand how they're created, what's possible, and what's not possible. I no longer create fake nudes, nor link to them, because broadband (specifically the larger photos that it enables) makes it imposible to hide the evidence completely. So I can't really answer your question in this case, but thanks for playing! And now back to your regularly scheduled posting of topless-only, copyrighted Emily pictures.

  New pics

         

  

-REMOVED-

minge

:)