Kari Sweets - Comments page 3

Sun, May 1 2011 10:05
turrungo
Posts 35

Perfectly describes this new set barclay 1, to complement , preview of new set 411, in the peachyforum next link

http://peachyforum.com/t/kari-sweets-130068/43.aspx#1057497

Sun, May 1 2011 21:32
Hunter27
Classified
Posts 4,142
Retired Moderator
a couple of old pre shot sets released months after doesn't say much imho. I wonder if Felix still owns he domain.
Sun, May 1 2011 22:10
fapino07
Posts 164

[quote user="Hunter27"]a couple of old pre shot sets released months after doesn't say much imho. I wonder if Felix still owns he domain.[/quote]

obviously you don't know nothing about kari and she has a new webmaster (happily)

 

Mon, May 2 2011 2:48
barclay1
Posts 211
I've heard new webmaster, new photographer that didn't work out, and another new photographer she's happy with. But none of those would change ownership of the domain and trademark "Kari Sweets" would they?
Mon, May 2 2011 4:14
turrungo
Posts 35
I do not know, but it could be, kari the owner of the trademark and non-Felix
Mon, May 2 2011 11:02
barclay1
Posts 211

[quote user="Hunter27"]a couple of old pre shot sets released months after doesn't say much imho. I wonder if Felix still owns he domain.[/quote] 

Just to clarify, Set 410 - Comeback Kid actually does look like a new set. Maybe a different makeup artist as well as a new photographer. More to the point, in 410 Kari's figure looks more like it does in her recent webchats.

The weight change shows when you compare Set 410 with sets 347 & 351:

http://img269.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=56191_compareSets347_410_123_243lo.jpg

http://img221.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=56193_compareSets351_410_123_736lo.jpg


But set 411 and set 352 could easily have been shot around the same time:

http://img34.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=57589_compareSets352_411_123_360lo.jpg

(Note to Mod: I'll gladly remove these links if we're taking too many liberties posting them on this tread.)

Mon, May 2 2011 20:05
Hunter27
Classified
Posts 4,142
Retired Moderator
[quote user="barclay1"]

(Note to Mod: I'll gladly remove these links if we're taking too many liberties posting them on this tread.)

[/quote]

These can stay. They are relevant to a point of discussion. Though, lets try to keep new materials and links in her actual thread.

Sun, May 8 2011 12:56
fapino07
Posts 164
[quote user="barclay1"]

[quote user="Hunter27"]a couple of old pre shot sets released months after doesn't say much imho. I wonder if Felix still owns he domain.[/quote] 

Just to clarify, Set 410 - Comeback Kid actually does look like a new set. Maybe a different makeup artist as well as a new photographer. More to the point, in 410 Kari's figure looks more like it does in her recent webchats.

The weight change shows when you compare Set 410 with sets 347 & 351:

http://img269.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=56191_compareSets347_410_123_243lo.jpg

http://img221.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=56193_compareSets351_410_123_736lo.jpg


But set 411 and set 352 could easily have been shot around the same time:

http://img34.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=57589_compareSets352_411_123_360lo.jpg

(Note to Mod: I'll gladly remove these links if we're taking too many liberties posting them on this tread.)

[/quote]

all are recent pics: new web site administrator post on kari chat:" Come back kid photoset was shot with one of the new photographers on April 11th "

 

 

Wed, May 11 2011 10:24
barclay1
Posts 211

I just watched a longer version of the "footjob on bedpost" webchat vid, which was a "zero" for me. Kari evidently went on to give that bedpost quite the experienced-looking handjob, finally sliding her hand down inside her panties and rubbing herself. Okay. So now maybe I'd give that vid a "2".

But then I played it again with the sound (which I seldom do, since it's usually just music). What you hear is a surprising amount of friction coming from her handjob on the post, and also from her hand against her panties. I wouldn't have believed it, but the sound + image easily doubled the erotic impact for me.

Think we might see Kari expand on the "phallic object play" in the future? The tease limits on body revealing have been reached. New elements (beyond costume) should be added to take the tease in a different direction. Adding another girl was great. Now introducing a dildo or strapon--even if she just goofs around with it--would be progress (glacially speaking, of course).

Wed, May 11 2011 11:16
jerseyjay
Posts 32
[quote user="barclay1"]I just watched a longer version of the "footjob on bedpost" webchat vid, which was a "zero" for me. Kari evidently went on to give that bedpost quite the experienced-lookinghandjob, finally sliding her hand down inside her panties and rubbing herself. [/quote] It wasn't a longer video of the first. They were two separate videos and they were not webchats.
Wed, May 11 2011 11:38
jerseyjay
Posts 32
Edited that twice and the quote tags wouldn't work. @barclay They were two separate videos, and they were not webchats.
Wed, May 11 2011 13:26
barclay1
Posts 211

Thanks for the info, jerseyjay. I assumed they were from webchats because of no "www.karisweets.com" logo watermark -- which raises a more interesting question: If these were not webchats, are they from the website? Are these work-around-felix postings, or does she simply not have the means to attach the watermark?[quote user="jerseyjay"]They were two separate videos, and they were not webchats.[/quote]

Wed, May 11 2011 15:01
turrungo
Posts 35
I think the video would have been more sexy if she showed the expression of his face while she was the handhob to bed, hopefully make another video like this but doing a blowjob to some phallic object, like a cucumber or perhaps a dildo
Fri, May 13 2011 3:33
barclay1
Posts 211
I think I found the origins of the internet rumor (sorry, NOT true) that Kari Sweets and Aaliyah Love would be getting together on May 17 to do a girl/girl set or vid.

A site-specifying Google search of "Kari Sweets site:forum-------.com" brings up the following:

     www.forum--------.com - PORN FORUM :: Search
     May 3, 2011 - She's doing g/g on the 17th with Aaliyah Love. Topic: Kari Sweets ...

But when you click on it, the post quoted by Google was actually talking about Sarah Peachez (not Kari Sweets), in March (not May), and on a Sarah Peachez thread. Bizarre!

At least the rumor did produce something positive:

http://img200.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=80759_Kari_and_Aaliyah_123_419lo.jpg

(I believe credit for the fake pic goes to niffig)



Fri, May 13 2011 6:39
barclay1
Posts 211
Removed at poster's request. (redundancy)
Thu, Jun 2 2011 3:28
barclay1
Posts 211
Guess today was the big rollout. I've seen samples from "Comeback Kid" on at least 4 TGP sites already this morning. And with some new (though not recent) samples posted on Kari's splashpage, hopefully she's back in business for a while. Welcome back, Kid. Go for it!
Mon, Jun 13 2011 8:57
barclay1
Posts 211

Had high hopes for the handcuffs set (#412) because her ATF video wearing the same outfit was thin enough to allow some see through. Of course the videocam never stayed still long enough for more than a tease (duh!). Sad to say, for the photos Kari/Felix went with black & white. I can only guess the reason was to obscure any see through. Very disappointing.

The b&w makes a big difference. Here's 2 copies of the same vid frame from the ATF video. I simply removed the color from one.


Another complaint about the b&w set is how those handcuffs just blend into the background, limiting their visual impact. Remember the "Leather & Chains" set #96? And how good Kari looked the way her fleshtones contrasted against the black leather and metal?  Kari... since you're now releasing older archived material, please release a color set from the ATF session. (Or even better, do a new bdsm themed set!)

Wed, Jun 15 2011 2:55
ddddddd
Posts 100
Wow good eye, i didnt even notice the ATF outfit was see-through!!!
Wed, Jun 15 2011 12:54
jerseyjay
Posts 32
[quote user="barclay1"]

Had high hopes for the handcuffs set (#412) because her ATF video wearing the same outfit was thin enough to allow some see through. Of course the videocam never stayed still long enough for more than a tease (duh!). Sad to say, for the photos Kari/Felix went with black & white. I can only guess the reason was to obscure any see through. Very disappointing. [/quote] Making photos B&W is the lazy/easy way to photoshop. I highly doubt it was to hide anything see-thru. They were just lazy. [quote] Another complaint about the b&w set is how those handcuffs just blend into the background, limiting their visual impact. Remember the "Leather & Chains" set #96? And how good Kari looked the way her fleshtones contrasted against the black leather and metal?  Kari... since you're now releasing older archived material, please release a color set from the ATF session. (Or even better, do a new bdsm themed set!)[/quote] Nothing like a person to get porn for FREE then complain about it.

Fri, Nov 8 2013 12:07
samson10
Posts 93

nvm


Sort Posts: