jumper:
Ofcourse they don't photoshop. Oh wait. What about like every pic from behind in the BREATHLESS set. The webmaster must have forgotten about that one. There are even worse examples than the one below, but this is the only one I have from that set. He literally just blacked out her vagina. And for those of you who are good at photo editing and raise the light up on the photo you can see how garbage it is.
Please let Felix the webmaster respond to this. He won't because there is no way to state that THAT is not photoshop. If anyone has any other photo blurs or blocks from this set or site, please post!
haha, someone posted that same pic in the same thread!! this is what felix said:
"
if you go back to page 1 and read what i said, you'll see i posted a "construction" pic with her panties pulled down, and i proceeded to say "pics like that"... i was talking about pictures from the front where u would expect to see some lips but none are there
example #1: edited
example #2: straight off the camera, COMPLETELY undedited....example 2 was shot w/o lights, so i had a really wide aperature (f4) to shoot it....with the focus on her face, it made from her stomach down an out-of-focus blur
there's also another picture from the same set as example # 2, where her panties are completely off and somewhere down by her knees...many ppl think those are photoshopped, but notice where the camera's shooting from and pay attention to her body posture - 100% unphotoshopped :)
it kind of makes me laugh, cause its like it's a bunch of teen boys who've never seen a pussy in real life, debating about whether her pussy's been photoshopped!...i think if alot guys spent more time with a real woman instead of messing with the pics in photoshop & spending hours analyzing them, they'd realize the error of their ways :) "
anyway, i'm just the messenger...i guess its believable that they're not photoshopped....personally i dont really care because i enjoy them either way!