Katie Fey / Jenya D (MET-Art) / Eugenia Diordiychuk page 34

Katie Fey   Jenya D MET-Art   Eugenia Diordiychuk
Fri, Feb 9 2007 7:33
targal6
Posts 15
Could you put that picture  here please?
Fri, Feb 9 2007 7:55
Rayniac
Germany
Posts 6,716
Not that I really was waiting for such, but this could be a true historic event. Wink

The question is : is that really her? Wouldn't judge it from that 'perspective'.



Fri, Feb 9 2007 8:02
abominus
Posts 168

The moles on her right arm and hand do not match.  It must be a guest model.

 

Fri, Feb 9 2007 8:31
targal6
Posts 15
yes don't think it s her  cause i don't recognize her face like that nor her hairs.
Fri, Feb 9 2007 9:04
Rayniac
Germany
Posts 6,716
I don't think it's her either. But it's a little strange that she suddenly has guest models. And then, why that pic? Seems they want us to believe it's Katie.

Well, we'll see.
Fri, Feb 9 2007 11:31
djmax2
Enlightenment
Posts 297
abominus:

The moles on her right arm and hand do not match.  It must be a guest model.


Although she does have a mole on her wrist in approximately the right position, two moles below her index finger on the back of her hand are missing and no mole has even been on the centre of her hand. A prominent one lower down the medial of her wrist is also AWOL.

Her inner labia nearest her clitoris look too thin, though they may just be stretched.

I'd stake 90% this is either a cock-up by the webmasters (quite probably) or a guest model. If it is her though, may I be the first to say, fuuuuuck....
Fri, Feb 9 2007 15:47
targal6
Posts 15
Could anyone post the lasts videos which are on her site please?
Fri, Feb 9 2007 16:41
djmax2
Enlightenment
Posts 297
They've removed all reference to the picture at her site now.

Sad, I was beginning to think it might have actually been her...
Fri, Feb 9 2007 18:14
targal6
Posts 15

djmax2:
They've removed all reference to the picture at her site now. Sad, I was beginning to think it might have actually been her...

 

That s not because the picture has been removed that it s not her. I think it will be perhaps released after and not so soon as they told.

What do you think about that?

But it seems the cam and the light is not the same and that s perhaps why we don't really recognize her but some details show that it s definitively her finally like her ears, her noose...but the hairs seems to have another colour, not so dark...

It would be a shame to wait for a long time to know the truth...

Fri, Feb 9 2007 19:50
djmax2
Enlightenment
Posts 297
targal6:

That s not because the picture has been removed that it s not her. I think it will be perhaps released after and not so soon as they told.


What do you think about that?


But it seems the cam and the light is not the same and that s perhaps why we don't really recognize her but some details show that it s definitively her finally like her ears, her noose...but the hairs seems to have another colour, not so dark...


It would be a shame to wait for a long time to know the truth...



In analysing the photo I've come to a surprisingly similar conclusion.

Look at her nose in this comparison:



It's almost identical, as is the ear. It's just shot at an angle we're unfamiliar with.

The camera it was shot with is different, a Nikon instead of the Canon thats been used in the past, which might explain the difference in light or might suggest a different photographer and model.

Her pussy looks right too, long, thin inner labia with crests at the top just below a finger-like clitoral hood, and outer labia that become more pronounced to the anterior.

The moles are problematic. Specifically that one on the back of her hand. New moles can develop, and old ones can become more pigmented with exposure to ultraviolet sunlight, so perhaps it is her hand after all.

They could well have fucked up, accidently posting this set before they meant to. In any case, we'll be waiting a long time to find out, as you say. There's at least another month's worth of forthcoming updates already on the site.
Fri, Feb 9 2007 20:11
mirror mirror
Posts 20
Does anyone have the gallery 'footshot' that's previewed on her website ?
Fri, Feb 9 2007 22:39
wpmfpz
Posts 865

Since all this is pure speculation, I’ll add my two cents worth.

 

Katie’s site is affiliated with several other model sites.  They are probably all run by the same web master.  I think the web master put another models picture in Katie’s site.  When the mistake was realized, the picture was taken down.  Maybe even Katie logged in to check for messages and Horrified.

 

Think about it.  Even after Katie decided to go nude on her site, it was a while before she opened her legs even a little.  Even then the shots were not lighted very well.  Even her Mat-Art sets were at first shot with no pussy visible.  Only recently has she opened up, so to speak. 

 

While I don’t have all of Katie’s sets, I have a fair number.  I can’t recall any pictures where she was posed with her legs up and wide open in a well lighted shot.  If anyone has such a set, I’d be grateful to be pointed to it.  She’s never to, my knowledge, shown pink.  To think that all of the sudden she posed with her finger up her ass seems far fetched.

 

We shall see.

 

 

Sat, Feb 10 2007 1:35
ngolf
Posts 92
I'm pretty much in the camp thinking it's her.

 It was posted on her site- a site that almost never has other models. 

The girl bears an uncanny resemblance to her.  For example, peachy contains 100's of girls.  Find a single one who looks more like the picture than Katie (if someone does then I'll applaud them but I doubt anyone can do it).

90% it's her.
Sat, Feb 10 2007 4:23
alliknow
Posts 674
I agree with wpmfpz , this is not K.Fey! just a mistake...
Sat, Feb 10 2007 5:48
hidden dragon
Prague, Czech Rep.
Posts 481
ngolf:

The girl bears an uncanny resemblance to her.  For example, peachy contains 100's of girls.  Find a single one who looks more like the picture than Katie (if someone does then I'll applaud them but I doubt anyone can do it).

90% it's her.


come on now.  that's no logic.  if you know enough about katie, she's not the sorta stick the finger in the stink hole kinda woman.  that should say enough.
Sat, Feb 10 2007 6:34
targal6
Posts 15

hidden dragon:
ngolf:

The girl bears an uncanny resemblance to her.  For example, peachy contains 100's of girls.  Find a single one who looks more like the picture than Katie (if someone does then I'll applaud them but I doubt anyone can do it).

90% it's her.


come on now.  that's no logic.  if you know enough about katie, she's not the sorta stick the finger in the stink hole kinda woman.  that should say enough.

 

Not certain! I've read an interview from her once and i can tell you that she is quiet a naughty girl. For exemple she spoke about her favorite position, and that she loves making love in public places and so on... To my mind they try not to show us everything but in fact she is not as shy as we could thought. So it won't be so surprising if it s really her that put her finger in her ass hole.

Sat, Feb 10 2007 14:21
jimsin
Novi, Mi USA
Posts 2,892

Sitri:
How many are missing? i thinks it's "Orion", "Breeze" and "Curtain"?

You are also missing "Geniale" from 2005.

 

 

To add to the discussion about the "finger ass" pic,  IMHO it is NOT Katie!

 

Sun, Feb 11 2007 2:03
hidden dragon
Prague, Czech Rep.
Posts 481
targal6:

hidden dragon:
ngolf:

The girl bears an uncanny resemblance to her.  For example, peachy contains 100's of girls.  Find a single one who looks more like the picture than Katie (if someone does then I'll applaud them but I doubt anyone can do it).

90% it's her.


come on now.  that's no logic.  if you know enough about katie, she's not the sorta stick the finger in the stink hole kinda woman.  that should say enough.

 

Not certain! I've read an interview from her once and i can tell you that she is quiet a naughty girl. For exemple she spoke about her favorite position, and that she loves making love in public places and so on... To my mind they try not to show us everything but in fact she is not as shy as we could thought. So it won't be so surprising if it s really her that put her finger in her ass hole.



key word 'read'.  of course they are going to tell you something hot that everyone wants to read.  you do not know if she said that or if the webmaster just made it up to make things more interesting for us. if you watch her in all her videos she is quite hesitant to even show us her pussy.  you can always hear the camera guy say, 'jeeeeeeenya.....'.  he has to ask her to go further and she always responds with shaking her index finger at him or just teasing us more by turning away and embarassingly smiling.  now you are suggesting that she is sticking her finger in the corn hole?  i don't buy it one bit.
Sun, Feb 11 2007 8:08
targal6
Posts 15
hidden dragon:
targal6:

hidden dragon:
ngolf:

The girl bears an uncanny resemblance to her.  For example, peachy contains 100's of girls.  Find a single one who looks more like the picture than Katie (if someone does then I'll applaud them but I doubt anyone can do it).

90% it's her.


come on now.  that's no logic.  if you know enough about katie, she's not the sorta stick the finger in the stink hole kinda woman.  that should say enough.

 

Not certain! I've read an interview from her once and i can tell you that she is quiet a naughty girl. For exemple she spoke about her favorite position, and that she loves making love in public places and so on... To my mind they try not to show us everything but in fact she is not as shy as we could thought. So it won't be so surprising if it s really her that put her finger in her ass hole.



key word 'read'.  of course they are going to tell you something hot that everyone wants to read.  you do not know if she said that or if the webmaster just made it up to make things more interesting for us. if you watch her in all her videos she is quite hesitant to even show us her pussy.  you can always hear the camera guy say, 'jeeeeeeenya.....'.  he has to ask her to go further and she always responds with shaking her index finger at him or just teasing us more by turning away and embarassingly smiling.  now you are suggesting that she is sticking her finger in the corn hole?  i don't buy it one bit.

No i don't agree with you. Look at the DJmax picture which compare the so called jenya's ass fingering picture and the sure one and some details are too much smiliar. Morover the interview i was speaking about is not from her site but from a magazine that had interviewed her ages ago. And could you imagine that she would have done that "masturbation video set" if you would had only seen the other set? Not sure. I think that perhaps Jenya was more shy in the beginning but now she has perhaps changed and the different sets you can see are not so recent or taken in the correct order.

Sun, Feb 11 2007 11:18
djmax2
Enlightenment
Posts 297
wpmfpz:
Since all this is pure speculation, I’ll add my two cents worth.

 

Think about it.  Even after Katie decided to go nude on her site, it was a while before she opened her legs even a little.  Even then the shots were not lighted very well.  Even her Mat-Art sets were at first shot with no pussy visible.  Only recently has she opened up, so to speak.


The sets are in no chronological order: many of the ones being released now were shot in fall of 2005. Still more, like the boxing set, over a year old, haven't been published. What you have to consider is what would happen to all that backlog of photos if they now published photographs of her dabbling in her forbidden fruits. In an instance, all become worthless.


Whether Katie has progressed beyond the material we're accustomed to is debatable; I must admit I never thought she would do it, but how much you can ever gleam about someone from watching video-clips of them is not much more than what you'll get from, say, reading what somebody types in this forum--do any of you honestly suppose you know so much about me?


While I don’t have all of Katie’s sets, I have a fair number.  I can’t recall any pictures where she was posed with her legs up and wide open in a well lighted shot.  If anyone has such a set, I’d be grateful to be pointed to it.  She’s never to, my knowledge, shown pink


But then look at Tabatha Fey. On her site she barely shows any pussy, then she goes and does a series of shoots at angelfuns where she fingers and dildos herself.

 

Katie’s site is affiliated with several other model sites.  They are probably all run by the same web master.  I think the web master put another models picture in Katie’s site.  When the mistake was realized, the picture was taken down.  Maybe even Katie logged in to check for messages and Horrified.


This is what my immediate thought was upon seeing it. Indeed, this is the only reasonable alternative explanation. However, a lot of models can already be excluded from the identification parade:


Ariel Rebel: pussy wrong, breasts too small.

Felicity Fey: stop modelling last year.

Kristina Fey: this one is self-evident.

Paris Tale: blond, septum isn't tapered, larger inner labia.

Piper Fawn: mole on leg, no moles on hand, ass isn't crinkled.

Harmony Finn: ???: stopped modelling eons ago.

Exclusive T Girls: all trannies.
True Tere: this girls hasn't even shown her breasts yet, plus she's mexican and the skin tone is all wrong.
Ana Fey: stopped modelling awhile ago, but too ectomorphic and straight septum.

Dasha Markova: too ectomorphic, blond.

Ivy Summer: breasts far too small.


Plenty more to investigate, but I have a growing feeling it might really be her, however farfetched of an assumption that may sound to some here.

Sort Posts: