[quote user="a6114pf"]
jimsin:
Sorry dude, I should have seen this earlier, but that is the wrong Masha for this thread. She is Masha E, and the Masha in this thread was never identified with an initial.
Actually this is a tricky one. In the members area of MET both of these models are the same Masha. When viewing a photo set there is a link to that model's other sets. When I clicked this link this model came up under Masha E. The main confusion here is understandable until you closely scrtinise the pictures and also take into consideration that the photo sets in question here were taken almost a year apart and were from two different photgraphers. Plus there is a little photoshopping done in some of the pics. But this is the same model and she has 10 different sets on MET. 1st 2 by Gubin, 1 by Razin and the rest (including the set above in the red teddy) by Voronin. And yes she is F...ing Hot and I wish we could find more sites with her. If anybody has any ideas, please let us know.
P.S. this is the current thread here for her. http://peachyforum.com/forums/thread/281194.aspx
[/quote]
If anybody has any doubt that Gubin's red-haired Masha E and Voronin's/Razin's blonde Masha E are one and the same, have a look at these pics. As has been said before, this is indeed a tricky one. Different photographers (and sometimes the same phptographer, even in the same set) have done different levels of photoshopping. The immaculate goddess that we see in Voronin's sets turns out to be a bit less spotless in Razin's and Gubin's sets. But even Voronin leaves in enough moles for unambiguous identification: no, Met's index is not wrong. This is the same girl.
Look in particular at the mole/freckle I have labeled 4 in the first double pic. It's a double one. Both girls have it... Just a bit too similar to explain away as a coincidence I thought...