MET Art Boring?

Thu, Dec 29 2005 16:50
fuji9991
Posts 181
I am just curious to see if I am in a minority or not.  I find MET shoots very boring and unstimulating even though the women are stuningly beautiful.  Kinda like looking at a granet statute of aphrodite at the local museum.  I find that there are a grate deal of MET posts on this site so there must be a lot of fans but I am wondering if there are others like me that click thumbnails of a beautifull girl and are disappointed to find MET photogrophy.

What are your thoughts, I am just curouis and not condeming MET posts by any means.
Thu, Dec 29 2005 18:03
matadorstuff
UK
Posts 2,518
I do get where you're coming from. I often see a girl who's new to me on a TGP site (just a thumb of her face for example), but when I notice it's a MET, Domai, Hegre etc gallery, I don't usually bother to try and find more of her. Maybe because it's because, despite some of the photography being quite stunning, and certainly capturing the beauty of the models, it's the equivalent (to me) of looking at some nude in an art gallery... that might have got me off at aged 12, but now I need to see more, I need a photoshoot to be more explicitly sexual rather than sensual... But it's horses for courses I guess, and like you I'm certainly not criticising.
Thu, Dec 29 2005 20:37
Fucktard
San Diego, California
Posts 3,043
Retired Moderator
I see what you mean that MET needs to loosen up a little bit. They have been doing the same kind of artsy shoots with the soft filters for like 7 years now. The thing about MET is that they get such a high quality of girls, alot of them not to be found anywhere else. I am not a huge porn guy, but when I see a girl I like, I know immediately, and it doesn't really matter what the posing scenario is at first. But then, later, I guess like everyone I start wanting to see more and more of certain girls....which is where MET falls short for alot of people. For the highest quality and huge pics, and also the highest quality girls....it's the only game in town. But if you start wanting to see those same girls spreading and fucking etc., you're pretty much out of luck. I don't know if any of you remember Katerina (aka Alla) from there, but she was (and is) the most beautiful girl I have ever seen on the net. She did like 10 totally soft-core sets and POOF!....disappeared. Never did a set anywhere else that I know of, and damnit she really needs to.
I say MET is fine....they do what they do, and that's pretty much understood. I just wish other harder sites could equal their girls is all....

F~
Fri, Dec 30 2005 5:30
Fragile_Faith
deaf girl in a silent world
Posts 9

I agree with this - I think. MET art from what I have seen, and I am fairly new to looking at a lot of porn, show really beautifully photographed pictures of girls. Any girl would look beautiful and sexy photographed by them and they are a real tribute to the beauty of the girl's bodies. But they are all the same and so the individual personality of each girl does not come through. And. writng as a girl, I think pictures of people in general but definitely porn and erotic pictures of girls are better when you can get some sort of feel for the person who is in the body, for the person who is giving her body for the men looking at it to enjoy.

I really admire and look up to all the girls who pose and perform in porn but in general I agree that harder core is better and MET do not do this. A girl's body it seems to me is at its most feminine and womanly when it is being used by men for sex - there you can see what a fully sexual girl's body is.In good hard core porn (and there can be a lot of bad stuff about) the men perfomers and the other people making it are concentrating on showing the girl's body in as sexual way as possible to bring out its beauty and sexuality for the enjoyment of men looking at her. Also I think when doing hard core porn it is almost impossible for at least something of the girl's personality to come through because it is almost impossible not to react to having guys f*ck you in front of others and she has to take part in it. It is best, I think, when she is not being asked to perform any role but just to be herself - showing her body to men for heir pleasure and letting others show her body in the same way at its most sexual. I think it would be really good if the people in MET would use their talents like this to do hard core stuff with their models.

And of course I think hard core is better as I get to see men cumming and I love seeing men sexually enjoy girl's bodies!!

Just one girl's view.

Faith

 

Fri, Dec 30 2005 17:19
jimsin
Novi, Mi USA
Posts 2,892
Sorry, but I have to disagree with you on this one.  To me the hc porn that is out there is all the same.  I tired of seeing that within weeks of finding it on the web.  I mean how many times can you see some nutsac slammed up against a pussy or anus.  Or how many "facials" before it all looks the same.  I think that sites like MET, DOMAI, Femjoy all contribute greatly to the erotica on the net.  They may not be everyones "cup of tea",  but as it has been said; "To each his own, said the lady as she kissed the cow".  If you don't want to see it or are bored by it - skip on by.  I do to most of the HC stuff.
Fri, Dec 30 2005 20:09
mrspock
Posts 1,633
MET is defintively not boring. I wish we could see the same variation in hardcore for e.g. with different locations like beaches, meadows, on haylofts etc. instead of ordinary hotel rooms with bed, the girls not dressed like sluts, bedded on silk etc. I like the innocent look of MET-girls and I like them in natural poses that show their beauty best IMO, not to forget, that the most girls in hardcore are less beautiful. Would I like to see MET-girls in hardcore? Damn, yes! I'd love to see such flawless beauties beeing fucked, giving handjobs and blowjobs, taking facials or swallowing cum etc. at least once, but not permanentely, because I like the sensual MET-style equally. But MET can't provide hardcore, most of the beautiest girls would have never worked for them without MET staying "clean", because the girls don't want to be lumped together with "porn sluts", not to mention that most MET-girls would never do hardcore themself. Surely everyone agrees, that nude is better than nothing.

BTW: As already said, I'd love to see more MET-girls in hardcore, thus I've started a thread with this theme (also including girls from Hegre, Galitsin and MPL), see following link and enjoy!
Girls from MET-Art, Hegre, MPL, Galitsin in hardcore action!

Sat, Dec 31 2005 10:25
funky2004
Amsterdam
Posts 90,340
Retired Moderator

1,000 people = 1,000 different preferences.

Whatever you think of MET; it's still one of the most successfull and profitable paysites around.....

So there must be people out there who do like it.

 

Sat, Dec 31 2005 14:02
fuji9991
Posts 181
 funky2004 wrote:

1,000 people = 1,000 different preferences.

Whatever you think of MET; it's still one of the most successfull and profitable paysites around.....

So there must be people out there who do like it.



True enough.  I guess it was a dumb question.  You can put any "porn topic" in the blank and some will love it; others would hate it; and everyone else wouldn't care.  I am glad sites like MET bring high quality photography and girls to the forefront.  I myself will be looking out for the girls who are a little more sexually liberated in front of the camera.

Hats off to the guy that started the MET hard core thread.  It was interesting to go from this thread to a post that showed the topic in direct contrast.  Although I did notice that most of these MET girls participate in bragin basement hard core shoots, my guess is most shoot HC prior to MET in their home countries with amaturish outfits.

Regardless of your topic or oppionion this site is great.  I have been surfing it for years and it is the #1 portal no matter what your taste.  Keep up the good work.
Tue, Jan 3 2006 5:10
Fragile_Faith
deaf girl in a silent world
Posts 9

It is OK that different people have different likings.

But I do not think that this is a question of MET against hard core. There is some terrible cheap soft core porn out there and an awful lot of bad hard core as well.

MET offers really good quality erotic soft core photographs of girls bodies. They show girl's bodies to be beautiful, erotic and sexy. But it seems to be that they use too much of the same style in all their photographs so in a way each girl looks the same.

My problem with them is that if they were to use their skills and appreciation of a girl's body to bring out her individual personality and if they were to use more explicit hard core type settings where her body was not just being displayed but actually being openly used sexually then you would both see more of who she is as a person coming through and you would have a wider variety of ways in which her sexuality and body could be displayed with the kind of  beauty that MET appreciate in girl's bodies.

Faith

 

 

Tue, Jan 3 2006 11:42
mrspock
Posts 1,633
 Fragile_Faith wrote:
MET offers really good quality erotic soft core photographs of girls bodies. They show girl's bodies to be beautiful, erotic and sexy. But it seems to be that they use too much of the same style in all their photographs so in a way each girl looks the same.

The opposite is the case, they have greater variety of styles than others in softcore/hardcore, clothes from various eras, varius places, appealing poses. All sites have their restrictions, MET produces nothing towards hardcore while others are missing MET-style.

 Fragile_Faith wrote:
My problem with them is that if they were to use their skills and appreciation of a girl's body to bring out her individual personality and if they were to use more explicit hard core type settings where her body was not just being displayed but actually being openly used sexually then you would both see more of who she is as a person coming through and you would have a wider variety of ways in which her sexuality and body could be displayed with the kind of  beauty that MET appreciate in girl's bodies.

IMO girls in natural poses look more beautiful, in explicit poses they look hornier, two different switches to arouse us, none is generally better than the other, it depends on preferences. But, as already said, the problem is, if MET would get more explicit we would get a lot less beautiful girls on MET.
Tue, Mar 21 2006 5:26
paintedtoes
Member for over 7 years!
Posts 2,161
"...MET Art Boring?..."


Yes it is.


Painted
Mon, Apr 17 2006 11:32
MetMonk
Posts 330

No it's not...

As ever, tastes differ. Met, , , Hegre are examples of a specific genre. Eolake Stobblehouse, he of , calls it "simple nudes" and explains it in this article: http://domai.com/text/DOMAI-style.html.

He protests that nudes have traditionally been placed either in the fine arts department, or in the porn department. He is not attacking either porn or fine arts, but he believes that the beauty of the female form is the primary objective of neither. To qualify as Art, a picture must transcend its subject. The model is secondary to some "higher purpose" and often becomes "de-eroticized". In the case of porn, the model is secondary to some action of a sexual nature. Nothing wrong with that, but not what everybody wants. The concept of "simple nudes" is to focus on the model and celebrate her unadorned beauty.

One way to understand what good photography is is to look some of the photo shoots at met & friends and then visit the same girl at another site. All too often, the magic is gone. The nymph that you met by the lake side, the siren that was playing in the waves now inhabits a suburban bed-sit. The spell is broken, Cinderella has turned back into the girl-next-door. And when she takes her clothes off for another photographer, you feel like taking her to the nearest lingerie boutique so she doesn't have to wear those silly panties next time.

But again, tastes differ. Not everybody is an incurable romantic like me. Sites like www.abbywinters.com demonstrate that some people would probably prefer Met's typical little princess in her girl-next-door incarnation. Not to mention the millions of sites that are there for the people who will find her boring until she stuffs something inside her.

So I guess we're all different. The world would be a boring place if we were all the same. And the web would be a poorer place without Met & friends...

Mon, Apr 17 2006 12:10
mrspock
Posts 1,633
MetMonk:


One way to understand what good photography is is to look some of the photo shoots at met & friends and then visit the same girl at another site
. All too often, the magic is gone. The nymph that you met by the lake side, the siren that was playing in the waves now inhabits a suburban bed-sit. The spell is broken, Cinderella has turned back into the girl-next-door. And when she takes her clothes off for another photographer, you feel like taking her to the nearest lingerie boutique so she doesn't have to wear those silly panties next time.



Well spoken words, I agree! I don't want MET to produce hardcore porn for the reasons I've already explained. Instead I wish to see more porn from other producers which is more artistic, for e.g. the nymph by the lake side or siren playing in the in the waves mets a guy and gets then fucked,  all photographed and directed by a really good artistic photographer. For this reason I started the theme Art + Hardcore = Artcore, help is welcome!
Wed, Apr 19 2006 0:40
jimsin
Novi, Mi USA
Posts 2,892

Again, I agree that MET is far from boring. 

The most important and erotic part of the human being is the brain and the imagination.  Too often the HC images that abound on the internet are dulling to the psyche and create an overload. 

The way that the softcore sites (MET, , , MCL) present the beauty, allows the viewer the opportunity to put himself/herself into the picture.  This lets the imagination of the viewer loose to enjoy all of the image and decide how he/she would react if he/she were there with the model.

Wed, Apr 19 2006 21:08
paintedtoes
Member for over 7 years!
Posts 2,161
I understand there are fans here of Met-Art. But in my eye's when it comes to a galley/link/pics/set(s)...if you will. They all look the same more OR less and TEND to have the same theme OVER and over again.

But for those who like it...cool. :)

Painted
Thu, Apr 20 2006 11:11
Toadpipe
Posts 378
personally, i'm not a big fan of h/c  and my favorite sets are just beautiful girls posing alone.  cum to think of it, i don't really like lez, unless a  close up with a fine girl next to a kootch.  i mean thats like pie and chips.  so met art... yaaaaah
Fri, Apr 21 2006 0:45
jch1
Posts 4,583
Retired Moderator
i'm completely biased, being a diehard fan from the beginning, but what sums it up for me is this: i can't count many times i've seen a met girl pose somewhere else too, and she's always hotter at met. to each their own and vive la différence, i say, but for me, this never fails. the sets are always better.

Sort Posts: