Perception and taste

Tue, Jan 23 2007 11:55
etonflan
Posts 10
For the past two or three years I've been a daily lurker here. I would like at this time to offer my gratitude and appreciation for the work that all of the contributors, regular and otherwise, have performed and continue to perform every day and night. It is, to say the least, beyond simple pleasure.

We, the population at Peachy, have examined with delight the faces and attributes of countless women. I have had many happy encounters here, and I also have discovered a few things about human nature. I would like to share two of those now. One is about perception, the other about taste.

First, I marvel at the perceptions of some contributors who think that they have found pictures of a certain model and in fact have not. Matching a likeness can be difficult, especially when make-up is factored in, among certain females. But there have been instances in which the poster has guessed wildly and has missed the mark, posting instead photos of a different girl. In some cases the difference is astonishing. Yet another example of the wide diversion of perception among homo sapiens.

Second is about taste. Specifically this: I wonder why so many galleries of females show them with their hands in or on their pussies, and also why they spread the lips to show the inside so frequently. I know, I know: To each his own. Yes, I agree. The fact that I happen to like to look at the vulva without hands in the way and closed or naturally opened rather than forcibly spread is simply my preference. The kind of pictures I like I find to be beautiful and erotic. No doubt those who enjoy seeing vaginal membranes find them to be beautiful and erotic as well. So be it.

I thought of an analogy to put this in perspective a bit. When you have a car that you really admire, you wash it and wax it and park it in your driveway and stand there or sit there and take it all in, with pride and satisfaction (and maybe a bit of a boner if it's a truly hot car). Sure, you lift up the hood and look at the engine from time to time, as you should, but you don't leave the hood up and stare at the engine all day. The car, it seems to me, looks a lot nicer with the hood closed.

I like to look at girls with little or no makeup just standing there facing me with a little smile. Hands at their sides. Brings back some nice memories.

Eton
Tue, Jan 23 2007 15:20
Neeger Kirvega
Preparing for zombie invasion!
Posts 308
etonflan:
Second is about taste. Specifically this: I wonder why so many galleries of females show them with their hands in or on their pussies, and also why they spread the lips to show the inside so frequently. I know, I know: To each his own. Yes, I agree. The fact that I happen to like to look at the vulva without hands in the way and closed or naturally opened rather than forcibly spread is simply my preference. The kind of pictures I like I find to be beautiful and erotic. No doubt those who enjoy seeing vaginal membranes find them to be beautiful and erotic as well. So be it.

I thought of an analogy to put this in perspective a bit. When you have a car that you really admire, you wash it and wax it and park it in your driveway and stand there or sit there and take it all in, with pride and satisfaction (and maybe a bit of a boner if it's a truly hot car). Sure, you lift up the hood and look at the engine from time to time, as you should, but you don't leave the hood up and stare at the engine all day. The car, it seems to me, looks a lot nicer with the hood closed.


I dont know either but i suspect it has something to do with models being nervous on the set and.. as you are in one position the photographer takes hundreds of pictures, has to get pretty boring right? Stick out tongue
Tue, Jan 23 2007 19:33
billcat
Reading PA
Posts 291

"Sure, you lift up the hood and look at the engine from time to time, as you should, but you don't leave the hood up and stare at the engine all day."

Purrsonally, I'd rather see the engine and the undercarriage. Smile

Otherwise, I my tastes are similar in preference.  I also really dislike the whole growling look - its like they're in the middle of a free lift or something.

As for perception .. well ... some photographers and whoever-else-coaches-models create an entirely different look for a girl if they think that's the more profitable way to go.  Jenna Jameson is a great example of a thousand 'looks,' as is Madonna.  Easy to fool someone who is not examining the pics critically.

prr'rrrrrrrrrrrrrrr,

BillCat, hopefully without boxes around everything this time


Sort Posts: