Attachment: tmp_950449a42bd527ae49fa31693db7cce1.JPG

 In reply to  Wath, who asked on post of Sun, May 16, 2010 :  Please do not degrade her beauty to another babe showings her cunt.

Wath, everyone has his own free will,  and now, after Mila has open her  secret garden (let her blessed!) is she degraded?  I think she has not degraded her beauty  at all (I suggest  you to read the novel     Veronika decides to die     - ( Portuguese:    Veronika decide morrer) by the famous brasilan writer Paulo Coelho, where it is described the desire of this girl to masturbate herself just in front a boy);  Mila has known what to do, if she followed her heart.

Wath, I know what you mean about. By your words you seem a sensitive and romantic person, not attacked by our materialistic society yet, lucky you!; but I invite you to consider the fact by another point of view. I don't think that to show a pussy can degradate the woman's beauty, it could be the opposite. For this purpose, please give a look to the famous painting    the origin of the world    by Gustave Coubert, exhibited at D'Orsay Museum in Paris, here enclosed. Moreover, check for  the play    Vagina Monologues, written by Mrs. Eve Ensler (based on interviews carried out with hundreds women), where in a act of the play, a man named Bob, says that a woman can be known by looking at her pussy, only (you can find all above on web).

 Wath, I think that it depends on mainly how you look at the pussy (with or without craving, desires, or lust. It is necessary a certain emotional detachment; a sort af contemplation), or how and why it has been showed. In my opinion, the pussy must be respected like a delicate flower,  worshipped, adored, and gently , quietly caddled, devoting it long, long time.

And then Wath, who we are to judge about morality statement, since it depends by people and time being only. There is a saying:  -  one's can rise up, only after one's has fallen down -.

http://hosted.met-art.com/met-art_TMU_142_490/

Attachment: MET-ART_TMU_144_0110-copia.jpg

Trying to defend Mila

Ladies and gentlemen, I need to share with you my  feeling and ask  your help to clarify my trouble that is taking me to a terrible obsession, i.e.: <why Murano chose Mila to do such kind of hot photos, never seen on Meet Art; as a sort of Murano rage versus her>. He does not do this with other models, I checked (to be clear, none of  Murano's model shows the clitoris hood deliberately lifted up, exhibiting her pearl!, as did Mila). I asked him by email, and he replied < unfortunately, not all Met Art members appreciate only the beauty of  face and body in models, most of them would want to go far beyond that >; I think it is a non sense answer, an unfair reply. Owing to my reserch (you can verify, if you wish), it is not true by the photos; this unequal, this is unjust. And then, if audience wants cruel images, does he this? just to have market approval and money? What about ethic and professional deontology?

This thought hurted me very much; I had several different thoghts conflicting among them, and I conldn't see an explanation. I tohught because Mila is ukrainian instead that russian, I thought that is usual to get more satisfaction humiliatig a beautiful woman than a ugly one; I though to a boy gets his pleasure ripping the wings to a beatuful butterfly; I thought, I thought....

Than, suddenly, just today, when I was looking again to the last set of Mila, a flash crossed my mind; I remember what stated on the foreword of Murano's site, herebelow an extraction:

 < I always go for the best and most beautiful things in my work. And the same goes for my equipment that's why I shoot with the world's most advanced camera and lighting gear.

Best quality in everything is my life credo>;

The sentence underlined, gave me the sense of his philosophy; he takes much care of technique, but to get a good picture it is not enough, it is needed, "eye, heart, brain", as said the great photographer H. C. Bresson. Murano can have the most advanced equipment, but certantily has not "eye, heart, brain". He takes picture by his mind, by technique, as he has a software inserted in the brain. He propose everytime his schema, without fantasy, without imagination, It seems he has not feelings, emotions, soul.

He said that he take care to the best and most beautiful things in his work, but if you look at some pictures of  last work with Mila, you will see that bars of round window are in polystyrene!, and the golden tissue on the window is fixed by pins, clearly visible; as the setting was arranged quickly, just patched together. There is a big gap from what Murano says, and what Murano does; he stated that < The female body is the most beautiful God's creation>, but he does not represent the women how they deserve (in my opinion); he has his own concept of beauty, of love, of art, out of reality. Some line before, he wrote (see his website) :<To be surrounded by beautiful women even silly ones is an every man's dream>. Have you ever met a  really silly woman, apart if affected by mental desease? he has bad idea about women.

I am thinkig Murano has some problems with women, even if well hidden.

I will really appreciate your point of view as regards, because I can be mistaken, and I do not want have a bad opinion of Murano based on my wrong interpretation or assumption. I would like clarify my mind and get quite.

My suspicion is Murano spoiled Mila by seducting her (he his a great public relation man, an illusion maker, and it is easy to win a youg woman, at beginning of her career), and invited Mila to show clitoris during the photo session, without previous agreement. But think, if my assumption is true, if Mila is you girlfriend, your sister, your friend, or your daughter, will be you happy about Murano behaviour?

I want clarify that I am not a moralist, Mila can show her body in the way she wants, but I have the suspicion that she was conditioned in showing her body, and this is unjust to me; a very bad relationship with model and photographer.

It would be nice that this forum will become an opportunity to exchange our ideas opinions, feelings, emotions, passions, about Mila's works. For example, I consider suitable for Mila the photographers Rylsky (see his phtos with Loreen A), Leonardo (see his photos with Jenya D), Dolce (see his photos with Anita C, and Sara B ), by their skills on managing lighting and good eye about human form. We could help Mila giving suggestions, advices, indications for her work. Otherwise this forum seems just an huge archive of photos, and nothing more.

What hurted me is Mila in the hands of a very bad person, she is wasting her time, her special beauty. Think if she would have been shot by another photographer! Look, at the last set "in the air", no post here till now, and few reference on web, this is a fact. I can tolerate, I can accept that a stupid man can destroy a beauty. It is too much! If you look to the last sets of Mila, she looks more woman, but she is more serious; she lost her smile, her spontaneity. Look, for example at Loreen A sets, she is always laughing, showing her graces.

Look at the last set of Jenya D, relased today; she is always  "closer", than Mila, but she get more attention, more success than Mila. Jenya set is already spread on web, Mila set  has just few links.

What is wrong in Mila, what is wrong in Murano: we have to help Mila in leaving Murano. Stop Murano, we can not accetp this anymore.

Ones' can not destroy a soul, a life just to show/see a naked open pussy or clitoris.

We can not loose Mila, her beauty, the world can not looses this beauty.

What can we do? Why do not contact Met Art by email, asking to give Mila another chance with another photographer, getting in touch also other forums, forming a chain?

What do you think about Mila, you can not answer if you wish; your silence is an approval; it's ok?

I'm sorry for the length of the speech, I wanted touch several aspects, thank you for your attention, and waiting for your reply I remain.

p.s.: from set "in the air",

In this picture, the body of Mila has a sort of torsion, similar to that  figures depicted by Michelangelo Buonarroti, in Sistine Chapel in Rome; I love them very much. These bodies have energy, strength, they are powerful. Murano kills the vitaliy of models, he put the model in pose by his cold mind, there is not energy in that poses, he doesn't care about life. Think this Mila position enligthed by grazing light; imagine the form, the volume of body exalted by lights and shade effects (tipycal of Michelangeo paintings). (I don't know who chose this postion, but if was Murano, he did just to display Mila's ass!). Another aspect I noted is Murano does not focus the attention on the model, but the model is part of the context; see the surrondings, they are always fascinating, apparently luxury, and model is just a part of furnishings (by the majority of pictures); Murano satisfys his ego, does not set off the beauty of women.

Well, with the risk of again being slapped on the hand by Mila........   Like I said earlier, I prefer Goncharovs work with Mila far  more than Murano's work.

With regard to those specific poses:  In the end it's you and you alone who decides.

If you don't want to do it, don't. It's realy that easy. And i am pretty sure that almost everyone will keep on following your work wether or not you take those poses.

But if you decide to do them please don't loose your smile in the process. Because what i like most in you is that you look so playful and spontaneous and yet sensitive and fragile at the same time. More than any close up from your pussy.

I agree wholeheartedly with the forgoing thoughts.  Mila, you are truly beautiful and deserve a great photographer.  I do not believe that Murano is that photographer.  I don't know if you have the opportunity, but I think that the photographer called Leonardo (at MET) would do you a great justice.  I like his treatment of Jenya (Eugenia) and several of his other models.  I know that you don't have any control of the photos once they are shot, but maybe another photographer would give you more control of the actual shoot and not put you in uncomfortable positions. 

Best of all things to you,

Jimsin

Some HiRes sample pics from 3 sets Maia (GirlsInNature):

http://imageupper.com/g/?A030001009Y27884386654434

To Stainlack

>> Wath, everyone has his own free will,  and now,

I agree with you. Everyone has its own will.

But as far as I know the photographers (and we, the "users") the things will get harder. I saw many beautiful girls in my surf-career who ends in hardcore pornograhic videos. Maybe in case of Mila I am a romantic user and I like also as a person - as far I can decide by her postings. I hope, I will never see her in such videos (of course I look at those).

The last series are getting more and more pussy-centered.Why? I can see a lot of fans here. They were getting fans before the new series began. The love the way she smiles, she stands, her look, the color of her eyes and of course the whole body including the perfect breasts with a nice looking pusssy. She looks like an angel and everyone of my Net-Buddies who saw her the first time agreed.

And I love her pussy and I look it in the way a "boyfriend" will do and not like a "Hey, lets fuck another girl"-boy.

>>And then Wath, who we are to judge about morality statement, since it depends by people and time being only. There is a saying:  -  one's >>can rise up, only after one's has fallen down -

I will not judge her. If she wants it then it is her choice and I will accept it. Acceptance means not to say it is a good choice. I don't know her age and I try to estimate 19 plus minus. And all of you know that this business can be hard for 19 year old girl and this businesss goes far beyond all acceptable morality - that is when the psyche will be hurted.

stainlack, maybe it is the good old protective instinct of man - and believe me the instinct in this case isn't that bad.

>>to show a pussy can degradate the woman's beauty, it could be the opposite.

I agree again in the cases you have listed. But is the porn-business related to your listed cases (imaginery literature, painting, anonymous interviews)?

Thanks for reading

----------------------------------

To Mila: I only want to make you to think about. I like it more to see you in the "Vogue" instead  the new DVD "Young Teens and Old Bastards Part 4"  ... ;-)

>>I have a question for all, many photographers want me to shoot as http://www.thenude.eu/covers.php?g=6&id=65452 (I mean pussy) I do not agree but they >>insist, I want to know your opinion !

Posing: If want it by yourself - than it is ok

Pubic hair: in Germany pubic hair is still accepted, and I think it is still natural - than it is ok

Color of hair: Please stay natural 

Color of eyes: Impossible