Emily 18 page 11

Thu, Aug 31 2006 19:31
betax9
Posts 50
there fake i can assure you of it
look clossly at the bottom of her vag when its going to her taint
you can see they airbrushed the tatoos off and her scar from having her appendix removed as a child
there real

i didnt know she lived in california though
Thu, Aug 31 2006 19:34
noize69
Posts 15

they look real enough, the tats and other marks have probably been airbrushed...

love to see more!!

Thu, Aug 31 2006 20:06
abuz
Posts 45
-removed- do not post pics other then identification purposes - only full galleries, please - thx - V-
Fri, Sep 1 2006 13:16
qiuqiu
Posts 7
I believe Tight Mag would not do the stupid thing to create emily fake picsAngel 
Fri, Sep 1 2006 14:05
UpShut
Posts 267
If they are fake, then somone put a shitload of effort into the shadows and lighting in them. Infact, I'd say its close to impossible. Not even the best photoshops on Worth1000 have that kind of detail put into them.
Fri, Sep 1 2006 14:46
jrviolette007
Posts 54
Also she has had some photo shots where her panties where see through enough to make out her pussy and it does match these photos from what I can tell
Sat, Sep 2 2006 6:58
betax9
Posts 50
they are fake she dosent do nude photography

i think this was a paid set by some photgrapher and they photoshopped the pussy in i have seen a leaked picture of emily naked but she had like cotton fluff with tape on her pussy and on some pictures you can see a little bit of white around her pussy and its discolored too
ill see if i can find those pictures to post
THERE FAKE
Sat, Sep 2 2006 9:25
alias2005
Posts 89
The idea that theyve photoshopped the pussy in is stupid! Seriously - what is there to gain by doing that? Emily doesnt gain anything by allowing them to photoshop it in - if she doesnt want to show it shes not going to let them fake it!, and if the magazine have done it without her permission thats just asking for a major lawsuit!
Sat, Sep 2 2006 9:42
betax9
Posts 50
alias2005:
The idea that theyve photoshopped the pussy in is stupid! Seriously - what is there to gain by doing that? Emily doesnt gain anything by allowing them to photoshop it in - if she doesnt want to show it shes not going to let them fake it!, and if the magazine have done it without her permission thats just asking for a major lawsuit!


she dont due nudity even email her

there fake
and they due gain from it they get people to get hyped bout it and buy there magazine for the FAKE photos
Sat, Sep 2 2006 10:11
limbodan
Posts 29
This thread is getting ridiculous.  Why is it so hard to believe that this little tease exposed her pussy in a nudie mag?  The pics are absolutely real.  Sure, she'll tell you she doesn't do nudity if you email her.  That is part of her "tease" gimmick to keep you coming back to her site hoping to see a little bit more each time.  Its business, she makes more money if you keep falling for it.  Give it some more time.  She'll start showing pussy on her site too when subscribers start getting tired of the tease routine.  Look at all the other models who've done just the same.
Sat, Sep 2 2006 10:35
alias2005
Posts 89
I know what did I start... :S
Sat, Sep 2 2006 22:20
betax9
Posts 50
that isnt her pussy it is obvious look at the form of it it dont match
Sat, Sep 2 2006 22:37
madmadmikeyl
Posts 5
Let it go you wack-off freaks even if it is fake (but its not), it still look like a naked girl so do your thing and remember to clean up after.
Sun, Sep 3 2006 8:24
edhunter
Posts 27

It's strange.....Fake or no fake????Very strange....

A new real pics now:

 

http://www.highwaytgp.com/babes-b/emily18/8/askjolenecom.html

Mon, Sep 4 2006 1:57
Popie
Posts 10
definitely NOT fakes
Mon, Sep 4 2006 8:16
betax9
Posts 50
edhunter:

It's strange.....Fake or no fake????Very strange....

A new real pics now:

 

http://www.highwaytgp.com/babes-b/emily18/8/askjolenecom.html



thats like 2 years old lol

and it is not her pussy i can tell you that much
be decived if you want but they brushed her body so i think they did her puss too
if you look you can see it is not quite right lined up

Mon, Sep 4 2006 15:07
steve2006
Virginia, USA
Posts 440
Just adding my 2 cents to the beaten down subject of whether or not the nudes are really of Emily or not, I tend to agree with Betax that they are faked or photoshopped or whatever you want to call it.  I just doubt the photos are true nudes as they do look a lot like some previous phots she had taken for her site.  Also consider she has a paying website audience of loyal supporters who would be upset if she bared all for a less loyal following of just magazine subscripters who didn't even know her.  Consider how much more the magazine would have sold if they had put her on the cover and advertised her as a internet model going nude for the first time. Smile  My 2 cents

http://www.teentrap.com/hosted/emily18/reading/index.html
Mon, Sep 4 2006 20:54
steve2006
Virginia, USA
Posts 440

I'll never look at a baloon the same again after this           

http://www.8teenfiles.com/gals/emily18/183bekola/
Mon, Sep 4 2006 21:42
zubat
Posts 442

-removed-

POSTING COPYRIGHTED CONTENT WILL GET YOU BANNED.

Please don't make more work for all ready busy moderators, thanks.

Mon, Sep 4 2006 22:25
bigtama
Posts 40

-removed-


Sort Posts: